Skip to content

Start of Something Bigg?

2010 July 13

I had the pleasure yesterday afternoon of chatting with producer Peggy Rajski over at Boom Noodle on Capitol Hill. (More on Boom later.) Peggy produced a set of John Sayles films in the 80s including my favorite Sayles, Brother From Another Planet. (Baby-faced Fisher Stevens’ magic trick on the A Train is worth the price of admission.) She also produced The Grifters and Jodie Foster’s very excellent Little Man Tate. More recently, she exec produced Towelhead.

Peggy is here in Seattle shooting her latest film, “Grassroots,” directed by Stephen Gyllenhaal and starring Jason Biggs, Cedric the Entertainer and Tom Arnold. In spite of the actors’ pedigrees, the film is described as a buddy movie/coming of age film in the style of James L. Brooks so we’re likely to see actual acting with some depth of feeling and genuine emotion. (Actually, I’m a big fan of the high-strung Arnold who constantly works and frequently manages to land pretty interesting roles. I assume this will be one of those.) “Grassroots” is based on a memoir by former Seattle Stranger writer Phil Campbell who managed fellow ex-Stranger writer Grant Cogswell’s campaign for Seattle City Council in 2001. It’s a story about idealism and activism and people who actually lead rather than follow (which fits right in with my rant from the other day).

The really exciting thing about “Grassroots” (an appropriate title not just for the story but for the production itself) is that it contains all the right ingredients to have a major positive influence on the independent film scene. From my conversation with Peggy, they’re making all the right moves. If they continue along the path they’re on, “Grassroots” might just well become the elusive finance/production/distribution blueprint the community’s been groping for. It’s a pretty big IF, but I’m rooting for them as hard as I can and so should you.

The first thing they did right was maintain the integrity of the story by budgeting appropriately. The movie is called “Grassroots” for a reason. (It’s low budget film.) Next, they didn’t spend forever in development. True, it’s based on a memoir, but there are no rules in development hell. The process moved along relatively briskly and momentum in anything is good. Casting is interesting. I’m going to assume that Gyllenhaal and Rajski have seen proof that Biggs and his co-star Joel Moore have the chops to pull off quirky roles with the necessary gravitas that this flavor of storytelling demands. (I know Tom Arnold can.) So granting that, it’s important that Biggs, Cedric the Entertainer and Arnold all have the juice to make social media pay big dividends. Plus, the production recognizes how important a role social can play here and they’re arming themselves with all of the appropriate in-production tools for both immediate and ongoing implementation.

Which is all well and good. But by far the most exciting tidbit that Peggy shared is that she just secured a relatively sizable chunk of cash for distribution and marketing. This is the one that nearly always gets away. It’s discussed incessantly on panels and at seminars. It’s the Holy Grail and Peggy’s got it – and it’s never been a more valuable or critical asset in independent filmmaking than it is right now. It’s freedom. It’s a get of distribution jail free card and it’s going to allow the production to write its own ticket. If a studio calls and wants to plunk down tens of millions to acquire and market the film, great. But if not, then the producers have the wherewithal to pick and choose their distribution ‘partners’; to decide how many pieces of the pie to cut and who, if anyone, will get a slice. They may decide to keep all rights, hire consultants for distribution and roll the dice. Or they may *have* to do it that way. Regardless, they now have the flexibility and enough fuck-you money to do what’s right and best for the film.

Of course, I made an impassioned argument for streaming day-and-date with theatrical. Wide or limited, it makes no sense anymore NOT to make first-run streaming a central focus of any independently released film. This is the issue that will determine whether or not “Grassroots” becomes a champion and firebrand for independent film in the 21st century or whether it’s just another indie thrown on the heap. Only time will tell. Until then, I’ll keep a good thought.

Unfortunately and ironically, the only serious impediment to moving the community forward (besides general fear of progress) is Mark Cuban. Last I heard, he was telling filmmakers that if they stream their films along with theatrical, his Landmark Theatres chain – supposed champion of the independent community – won’t book them. Nice, huh? Cuban, of course, has his own little day-and-date play with Magnolia Pictures. Instead of streaming, though, it’s cable VOD that plays with theatrical. If Cuban ever pulled his head out of his ass long enough, he’d see that day-and-date streaming would only have a beneficial effect on both his VOD play and Landmark Theatres’ box-office. Unless, of course, it’s all ego. (Cuban? Ego? Ya think?) Maybe it has nothing to do with dollars and sense. Maybe it’s that *he* wants to be the day-and-date guy and, like a spoiled, petulant child, he refuses to share the playground with any of the other kids. (Most if not all major exhibition chins have iron-clad policies against booking films that appear online or in any medium before or during first run theatrical. But they’re not making their livings on the backs of independent filmmakers the way Landmark is and has for decades.)

Peggy, don’t let Cuban or any other gatekeeper force their last-century, paranoid, tyrannical nonsense down your throat. Even if you want to go theatrical there are still independents around the country who have a more progressive outlook. And you can always buy a NYC launch.

Light a 21st century fire!

ps – if you live in Seattle or plan to visit soon, do yourself a favor and run, do not walk to Boom Noodle for the Salmon Tataki.

  • http://www.diyfilmmaker.blogspot.com/ The Sujewa

    Is Northwest Film Forum still there?

  • Mark Lipsky

    It is!

  • Jason Reed

    Et tu, Mark?

    Indie film to be “saved” by a multi-millionaire industry insider from the TV business who could doubtless himself pay for this “grassworks” production several times over? And this is supposed to be “exciting”?

    One realizes your position, on the distribution side of things, is difficult. You can’t very well insult every production which comes along, as being insufficiently pure or authentic.

    But I thought this blog was about truth-telling, consequences be damned? Is there any reason to suppose that another “quirky” indie comedy(?) directed by a de facto celebrity is to be the saving of art-film in America?

  • Mark Lipsky

    Jason –

    Ouch.

    To be fair – to me – the headline of the post does include a question mark and the qualifier “Maybe”. The central point of the piece was that the production had the foresight and determination to secure a distribution and marketing fund that gives it the leverage to determine its own distribution strategy. This is an important lesson for any independently produced film. Obviously not everyone will have the ability to raise what I referred to as “fuck-you” money but even setting aside a few hundred dollars can be helpful.

    My other point was that this film – precisely because of its quasi-insider status – has the ability to take us all into a future that is right there in front of us. Only not everyone has the leverage or will to take those last few steps to streaming nirvana. Because “Grassroots” is a low-budget film with high-minded and somewhat well-positioned components, it’s possible that it will move the ball forward. Which will be good for everyone. Although you’ll also note that the post stressed the “big IF”factor.

    As for the star-power of the players involved or their bank accounts, I’m pleased to report that we still live in a democratic (capitalist) society. Even rich, successful people are allowed to do – or attempt to do – good work. From what I know about Stephen Gyllenhaal he’s a pretty good guy. Check out his blog on Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-gyllenhaal. He’s a poet, Jason. An honest to god poet! Are you a poet?

    C’mon, man, it’s too early in the day – both literally and figuratively – to take this kind of shot. Don’t you think? Let’s give Stephen and Peggy and Jason (the other Jason) and Cedric and Tom enough space to do their thing with “Grassroots”. If at the end of the day the film has a positive influence on the community, who gives a damn how much money the players may or may not have or where their family tree grows.

    And yes, this blog is steeped in truth-telling and calling shit and political correctness be damned. Which is why I’m telling you that who these people are or how much money they have or whether or not they’ve directed for TV is a bullshit argument to make. So sit back, relax, enjoy the moment and let’s just see what happens. Breathe Jason. And know that I’m still on your side.

  • Jason Reed

    Am I a poet, you ask? Well, everyone’s a poet in his own estimation, but I don’t think you want to posit S.G.’s verse (if you’ve actually read it, and have some basis to judge its quality?) as the bona fides of his Artist Entitlement Status. That way madness lies, to quote another and better poet.

    And I guess I’m am prepared to go further than you are on this question, since I have even less to lose than you do. Life is too short for this guy’s movie. These industry types have betrayed the medium for years. Who the hell cares what they have to say — or what some screenwriter (or a memoirist) gives them to say?

    And of course that whore Sundance will gladly welcome this terminally middle-brow movie to its bed, and the principals will stand up in front of the admiring crowds to explain all the life-endangering risks and sacrifices they took to make this wonderful venture, without which Western Civilization would be immeasurably poorer. You get the idea.

    I guess I’m trying to say that nothing good can come out of this particular culture. And besides, who the hell cares how good a movie is, if it requires stars, a well-connected director, a well-connected producer, etc. Because if that’s the case, the art form is doomed anyway. And it won’t be a masterpiece, we already know enough to know at least that much. There’s no more need to see this movie than there is to see the next episode of Grey’s Anatomy.

    This bullshit will never stop unless we reach critical mass – when enough people call out false idols and emperors, and describe American indies for what they truly are. Which is the same as saying that the bullshit will never stop.

  • Mark Lipsky

    Is that you Doghouse? I thought we’d come to some sort of understanding. Or truce.

    I gotta ask…what, if anything, are you personally doing to help? Besides prematurely and anonymously nitpicking low-budget film productions and pissing on Grey’s Anatomy? (I can’t bear to watch it either btw.) Leave “Grassroots” alone and go out and do something constructive for Western Civilization – or any civilization. A mind is a terrible thing to waste but you’re wasting a pretty good one here. Yes, you clearly have a worthwhile mind and you owe it to all of us to put it to some good use. Certainly some better use than this.

    Go pick on Osama bin Laden. Or Mark Cuban. Or Marc Rosenbush. Or just get outta the house and take a walk. Clear your head. And don’t come back here until you have something useful and meaningful to contribute. OK?

  • http://libertynumber5.blogspot.com Jon Croft

    Yeah, I hate hopeless drivel. Nothing more of a f-ing waste than hopelessness (have an honest look around for God’s sake) nothing worse except of course the silly urge to bludgeon your brethren because of your own private feeling of hopelessness. At least there is a better chance that this ‘middle-brow’ indy can make a difference- some sort of a difference better than the sad films that don’t have any budget to say “F-U” to all the gatekeepers… which is most of us.

    But there is the inevitable and hopeless descent into mediocrity of said film staring us in the face- if it does not use that money to widen the gap for other indies to follow in its blazing path. It has nothing to do with the quality of said film. Meaning, hopefully, Peggy can be helping to blaze a path for others to follow- otherwise I might feel the temptation of a hopeless rant coming on.

    So “Light a Fire Peggy!”- & don’t give into the temptation to sell for less than the definitive “Trail Blazing” situation! We will all deeply appreciate it! :)

  • Jason Reed

    Mark,

    No, I’m not the estimable doghouse. That hound is not the only one who can put out a fancy prose style.

    But you’re right. These rants are pointless. American independent film is what is it for a reason, and there’s no fighting that organization and those restrictions. Either contrive to work with what you have, or get out.

    What am *I* doing? What I can do, which necessarily means far more writing than production. For anyone with a more or less traditional dramatic ambitions, there’s not much to be said for persistence in American indie film — sooner or later you start feeling like the “actress” who’s been waiting tables for 30 years. It would make far more sense, for anyone with pretensions to an original mind, to write novels. Which is probably why there are far more accomplished novelists in contemporary America, than filmmakers. The filmmaking field would seem more promising today (in terms of actually getting work made, if not for commercial prospects) for animators and non-narrative “experimental” filmmakers. Then again, most of the dull bulbs in this business regard my more or less traditional dramatic material as “experimental”. You really can’t win with these people.

    But I’ll take your advice: these blogs are hazardous to one’s health.